Galan Lithium (GLN) – My Thesis
Entry Exit Plan/ Not Advice
Entry: Current market cap ~A$150m (share price A$0.14-A$0.15).
Exit target: Sell into the next lithium upswing at ~0.5× Lithium Argentina’s expected upcycle value (US$1.0B ≈ A$1.5B), implying ~A$750m for GLN (~5× from ~A$150m today).
Timeframe: No fixed date — exit when the cycle turns, not on the calendar.
Dated: 5-Oct-2025
Why I'm Writing This
This is not a stock recommendation. It's my personal thesis to clarify why I own Galan Lithium. Writing it forces me to test my logic and assumptions.
Please go through the My-Investment-Thesis-and-Disclaimers Document before you proceed with this
Important: This represents personal investment analysis and should not be considered financial advice. Always conduct your own research and consult with financial professionals before making investment decisions.
Investing at the Bottom of the Cycle
Lithium is currently in a downcycle. History shows that the best time to invest in commodity projects is when sentiment is poor and capital is scarce.
Companies that succeed are the ones that push forward in downturns and commission into upturns. Those that start projects during booms often find themselves coming online when prices have already rolled over. Core Lithium in Australia is a cautionary example of this. Galan is positioning itself the right way — building now, so it can produce when demand and prices recover.
Capital Discipline and Conviction
The strongest proof of project viability is raising capital in weak markets. Galan has completed its capital raising for Phase 1 construction and has stated no further raise is required before production.
Equally important: in April 2025, Galan rejected a takeover offer at A$0.28/share (~A$240m valuation) — nearly triple its then-trading price. Management, who own large personal stakes, could have sold out at a premium. Instead, they held firm, signalling belief that the long-term value of Hombre Muerto West far exceeds that price.
Demand Beyond EVs
Lithium demand is not just about electric cars. The growth drivers are broader:
EVs
sales are still growing, albeit at a slower rate.
Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS)
growing at ~50% annually, critical for renewable integration and stabilising the huge power draw of AI data centres.
Heavy transport
buses, trucks, and logistics fleets are electrifying, which requires much larger battery packs.
Defence
drones and drone swarms are now central to military planning, requiring vast silent battery stockpiles.
Together, these use cases show that battery demand is exploding, and supply is struggling to keep pace.
Brine's Cost Advantage
Brines can produce lithium carbonate directly, making them ideal for lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries, which now dominate in China (~70% market share).
Brine projects sit firmly at the low end of the cost curve. In today's prices, many hard-rock projects are loss-making, while brines remain viable.
Galan uses proven evaporation methods, avoiding the risks of Direct Lithium Extraction (DLE), which is untested at commercial scale.
Supply Tightening
Large mining companies like BHP are acquiring lithium assets but often banking them rather than developing. This constrains future supply, increasing the scarcity premium for juniors like Galan that are actively moving towards production.
Valuation
To put a price on Galan, I compare it with Lithium Argentina (LAR) — one of the better-known lithium names.
LAR was spun out of Lithium Americas (LAC) in 2023, separating the Argentine operations from the U.S. projects. Since then, LAR has been in the news as the U.S. government has taken a direct stake in Lithium Americas' U.S. business (the Thacker Pass project in Nevada), underscoring the strategic importance of lithium supply chains. LAR itself is a pure-play on Argentina, holding assets within the same Lithium Triangle brine basins as Galan.
Lithium Argentina (LAR)
- Market cap ~US$675m.
- Owns significant stakes in projects in northern Argentina, including the Cauchari–Olaroz brine project, which is already in production.
- Owns ~45% of that project (the rest split with Ganfeng Lithium and the provincial government).
- Also holds a 33% interest in another Argentine brine project, Pozuelos–Pastos Grandes.
- Combined, LAR has an attributable resource base of ~12.6 Mt lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE).
Galan Lithium (GLN)
- Market cap A$150m (US$100m).
- Owns 100% of the Hombre Muerto West (HMW) and Candelas brine projects in Catamarca, Argentina.
- Resource base: 9.5 Mt LCE.
- Average grade: 841 mg/L lithium — significantly higher than Cauchari–Olaroz (607 mg/L).
On an ownership-adjusted basis, Galan’s projects are not far behind LAR’s in size and carry a clear grade advantage. Yet Galan is valued at roughly 1/6× LAR’s current market cap.
Looking forward, both companies are highly leveraged to the next lithium upcycle. If LAR re-rates from its current ~US$675m (~A$1.0b) to ~US$1.0b (~A$1.5b) in an upturn, then valuing Galan at 0.5× of LAR’s upcycle value would imply ~A$750m. From today’s ~A$150m market cap, that represents about 5× upside.
This 0.5× peer multiple is conservative, reflecting Galan’s earlier stage of development, smaller balance sheet, and ASX listing. Even with those discounts, the re-rating potential is clear: Galan offers large-cap asset exposure at small-cap pricing.
Near-Term Milestones
Phase 1 ponds
substantially complete.
Nanofiltration plant
commissioning expected H2 2025.
First production
targeted H1 2026.
Funding
fully funded to Phase 1 production, with expansion to be supported by cash flow.
Horizon
This is a cycle play, not a long hold. The timing of the lithium upswing cannot be predicted precisely. My plan is simple: sell into the next upswing at ~50% of Lithium Argentina's market cap.
Subscribe to My Whatsapp Channel
If you like this content, you can subscribe to my channel to get notified when new articles are published.
I don’t post often, so there shouldn’t be any spam.
If you would like to browse all my earlier investment theses, you can find them here: